Links To And Excerpts From CORE IM’s “HFpEF: 5 Pearls Segment” With Links To Additional Resources

In addition to today’s resource please review CORE IM‘s Behinds the Scenes Videos: Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Posted: June 23, 2024
By: Dr. Alice Kennedy, Dr. Shreya P. Trivedi, Dr. Jennifer Ho, Dr. Rati Vani and Dr. Waleed Rehman
Audio: Dr. Alice Kennedy

Today, I review, link to, and excerpt from CORE IM‘s HFpEF: 5 Pearls Segment.

Posted: June 5, 2024
By: Dr. Rati Vani, Dr. Jennifer Ho, Dr. Ravi Patel, Dr. Emily Lau and Dr. Shreya P. Trivedi
Graphic: Dr. Jesse Powell, Dr. Michelle Lo
Peer Review: Dr. Greg Katz, Dr. Randy Goldberg, Dr. Snehal Bhatt

All that follows is from the above resource.

Play the podcast here.

TIME STAMPS    CME-MOC    SHOW NOTES    TRANSCRIPT    REFERENCES

Time Stamps

  • 01:59 Pearl 1 – What is HFpEF?
  • 11:22 Pearl 2 – Echo findings and diastolic dysfunction
  • 19:21 Pearl 3 – BNP
  • 25:06 Pearl 4 – Advanced Testing
  • 32:03 Pearl 5 – Treatments for HFpEF

Show Notes

Pearl 1: What is Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)?

  • Definition
    • Clinical syndrome of volume overload and elevated left filling pressures at rest OR exercise in a patient EF of 50% or higher
    • Poorly understood systemic syndrome that is likely an umbrella term for multiple conditions
    • Symptoms: dyspnea on exertion, PND, orthopnea, fatigue, exercise intolerance
    • Physical exam findings: JVD, pulmonary rales, LE edema
  • Pathogenesis for “Garden Variety” HFpEF or Cardiometabolic HFpEF
    • Originally thought of as a result of long-standing hypertension leading to LV remodeling and stiffness
    • Now, thought to be a result of obesity and cardiometabolic disease leading to systemic low grade inflammation, but still with evolving understanding
    • Coronary microvascular dysfunction, endothelial dysfunction, and altered myocardial energetics are thought to be central to pathogenesis
  • Risk Factors
    • Age
    • Cardiometabolic risk factors: obesity, hypertension, diabetes, CAD,  sedentary lifestyle
      • Over 80% of HFpEF patients are overweight or obese
    • Female specific risk factors include hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, specifically preeclampsia
  • Increased risk factors lead to increased prevalence of “garden variety” HFpEF
    • HFpEF makes up about 50% of HF cases, though the proportion is increasing due to an increase in cardiometabolic risk factors
  • HFpEF masqueraders
    • Based on history and physical examination, “masqueraders” of HFpEF must be ruled out
    • Clues towards possible HFpEF masqueraders
      • Suspected HFpEF but with low H2FPEF score*

*A Simple, Evidence-Based Approach to Help Guide Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Circulation. 2018 Aug 28;138(9):861-870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034646.

*H2FPEF Score: At Last, a Properly Validated Diagnostic Algorithm for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Originally Published 27 August 2018. Circulation Volume 138, Number 9.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035711

      • Kussmaul’s sign (increased JVP with inspiration)
      • Low voltage ECG relative to increased wall thickness
      • Intolerance of standard GDMT/neurohormonal blockade
      • Risk factors present for infiltrative/restrictive HFpEF in a young patient
    • Non-cardiac masqueraders: Pulmonary disease, kidney disease or nephrotic syndrome, cirrhosis, anemia, chronic venous insufficiency
    • Cardiac masqueraders: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, cardiac sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, valvular disease (severe stenosis, regurgitation, or mixed), myocarditis, pericardial disease

Pearl 2: Echo Findings and Diastolic Dysfunction

  • Echo findings alone cannot make or exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF
  • Diastolic dysfunction = inability to fill ventricle with adequate preload volume (end diastolic volume) at acceptably low pressures
    • Diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF* are NOT synonymous terms
      • Diastolic dysfunction is an abnormality in relaxation/filling, separate from LVEF or symptoms
    • Diastolic dysfunction can be a part of human aging
    • Diastolic dysfunction is a risk factor for development of HFpEF
    • Diastolic dysfunction cannot be observed on resting echocardiograms of ⅓ of HFpEF patients
    • Diagnosed by echo with the following parameters, where 2 parameters is indeterminate and 3 or more is diastolic dysfunction
      • LA volume index > 34 mL/m2
      • E/e’ > 12-14
      • e’ velocity
        • Septal e’ velocity < 7 cm/s
        • Lateral e’ velocity < 10 cm/s
      • TR velocity > 2.8 m/s
  • Other echo findings
    • Elevated LV filling pressure, either at rest or with exertion
      • Usually assessed with E/e’ (early  diastolic transmitral inflow velocity to mitral annular tissue velocity)
    • LA pressure increases -> progressive LA dilation
    • Increased LV mass index
    • Pulmonary hypertension in 70-80% of HFpEF patients
      • PA pressure estimated using TR jet velocity and RA pressure
    • RV dysfunction in 20-35% of HFpEF patients (marker of increased morbidity and mortality)

*A Simple, Evidence-Based Approach to Help Guide Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Circulation. 2018 Aug 28;138(9):861-870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034646.

*H2FPEF Score: At Last, a Properly Validated Diagnostic Algorithm for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Originally Published 27 August 2018. Circulation Volume 138, Number 9.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035711

*Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2020 Jun 5;53(7):e9646. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20209646. eCollection 2020.

*Echo for diastology [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016 Oct;19(Supplement):S12-S18. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.192585.

The Role of Echocardiography in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: What Do We Want from Imaging? [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Heart Fail Clin. 2019 Apr;15(2):241-256. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

Pearl 3: BNP

  • Natriuretic peptides are produced/released due to increased myocardial wall stress and cardiac stretch
    • May be normal in HFpEF
      • HFpEF does not necessarily elevate end diastolic wall stress (when concentric remodeling with LV hypertrophy occurs)
    • BNP is just one clue in diagnosing HFpEF, but must be combined with the entire clinical picture and echocardiogram
  • NT-pro-BNP is influenced by key features of HFpEF (AF, obesity, renal impairment, age)
    • Obesity is associated with lower BNP levels
    • AF and chronic kidney disease are associated with higher BNP levels
  • Natriuretic peptide deficiency, which is strongly correlated with obesity, may leave individuals more susceptible to pressure/volume overload
    • “Natriuretic” means sodium in the urine
      • Since BNP makes an individual urinate out sodium, one can understand why BNP might be elevated in volume overload and why lower than expected levels might be problematic.

Pearl 4: Advanced Testing

  • HFpEF probability scores
    • H2FPEF score
      • Use only with clinical suspicion of HFpEF
      • More useful in outpatient setting
      • Estimates probability of HFpEF vs non-cardiac causes of dyspnea
      • Heavy, Hypertensive, Atrial fibrillation, Pulmonary Hypertension, Elder, Filling Pressures
    • HFA-PEFF Score *
      • Calculated using functional/morphological criteria (based on echo) and biomarker criteria (BNP) levels to estimate probability of HFpEF
  • If diagnosis remains uncertain, consider RHC, including provocative maneuvers
  • Exercise RHC/stress echo to eval for elevated filling pressures that develop during exercise
  • Cardiac MRI and other advanced testing (e.g. cardiac PET) not required for a diagnosis of HFpEF, but can be used to investigate HFpEF masqueraders (e.g., hypertrophic cardiomyopathies, cardiac amyloidosis, or cardiac sarcoidosis)

*HFA-PEFF Score: How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [PubMed Abstract] [Full-Text HTML] [Full-Text PDF]. Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 21;40(40):3297-3317. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641.

Pearl 5: Treatments for HFpEF

  • Control risk factors
    • Manage hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and obesity
  • Medications
    • SGTL2i is the first line choice for HFpEF (class IIa in AHA/ACC guidelines, class I in ESC guidelines)
    • MRA (class IIb in AHA/ACC guidelines)
    • ACE/ARB/ARNI (class IIb in AHA/ACC guidelines)
    • Add on loop diuretics to decrease congestion
  • Outcomes and trial data:
    • EMPEROR-Preserved: Empagliflozin in HFmrEF and HFpEF
      • Empagliflozin decreased risk of HF hospitalization and CV mortality in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF (EF > 40%)
      • 13.8% event rate in the empagliflozin group vs. 17.1% in placebo group (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90)
    • DELIVER: Dapagliflozin in HFmrEF and HFpEF
      • Dapagliflozin reduced HF hospitalizations and CV mortality in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF (EF > 40%)
      • 16.4% event rate in dapaglifozin group vs. 19.5% in placebo group (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92)
    • TOPCAT: Spironolactone for HFpEF
      • Spironolactone is associated with a small reduction in HF hospitalization, but does not reduce CV mortality in HFpEF
      • Heterogeneous results across regions of enrollment in the trial have raised controversy about the trial results
      • Post-hoc analysis showed statistically significant benefit in the Americas for the primary composite outcome of CV death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization  (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98)
    • CHARM-Preserved: ARBs in HFpEF
      • Candesartan had no effect on CV mortality but prevented admissions for HF hospitalization for those with EF > 40%
    • PARAGON-HF: ARNI in symptomatic HFpEF
      • Compared to valsartan alone, sacubitril-valsartan did not lower HF hospitalizations or CV mortality, however, there was improvement in NYHA class and less decline in renal function in the sacubitril-valsartan group
      • Possible benefit in those with EF in lower range of eligibility
      • Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with reduction in HF hospitalization/CV mortality in women, but not men
    • Future of GLP-1 agonists
      • The STEP-HFpEF trial showed treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly led to greater reductions in weight loss, symptoms, and physical limitations compared to placebo
      • Ongoing trials are assessing effects on CV events and mortality

 

 

This entry was posted in Core IM, Heart Failure, HFpEF. Bookmark the permalink.